Re: [ros-diffs] [hbirr] 14162: - Moved the deleting of the process id from PiTerminateProcess to PiDeleteProcessWorker.

[Gunnar Dalsnes]

> This is not correct. If writing back the handle failed, it should not be 
> closed. It actually is a very rare condition if called from user mode, 
> but if called from kernel mode the handle pointer doesn't get probed, so 
> if you call the function and pass it a bad pointer you'll notice that 
> the process will have one additional handle in it's handle table, which 
> actually is the handle created in that function. It's also possible to

Sounds more like a bug than a "feature". And if this was a feature, we 
would all be expected to try to find the possibly created handle in the 
handletable every time a handle creating routine failed:-)

G.