[weiden] 13147: wrap access to foreign Peb with SEH

wrap access to foreign Peb with SEH
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c
  _____  

Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c
--- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c	2005-01-20 00:14:50 UTC (rev
13146)
+++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c	2005-01-20 00:31:52 UTC (rev
13147)
@@ -1720,7 +1720,15 @@

                        process so we're sure we're in the right
context! */
 
                     KeAttachProcess(&Process->Pcb);
-                    Process->Peb->BeingDebugged = TRUE;
+                    _SEH_TRY
+                    {
+                      Process->Peb->BeingDebugged = TRUE;
+                    }
+                    _SEH_HANDLE
+                    {
+                      DPRINT1("Trying to set the Peb->BeingDebugged
field of process 0x%x failed, exception: 0x%x\n", Process,
_SEH_GetExceptionCode());
+                    }
+                    _SEH_END;
                     KeDetachProcess();
                   }
                   Status = STATUS_SUCCESS;

[Royce Mitchell III]

weiden(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:

>  wrap access to foreign Peb with SEH
>
> Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c
>   
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  *Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c*
>
> --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c	2005-01-20 00:14:50 UTC (rev 13146)
> +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/process.c	2005-01-20 00:31:52 UTC (rev 13147)
> @@ -1720,7 +1720,15 @@
>
>                         process so we're sure we're in the right context! */
>  
>                      KeAttachProcess(&Process->Pcb);
>   
>
> -                    Process->Peb->BeingDebugged = TRUE;
>   
>
> +                    _SEH_TRY
> +                    {
> +                      Process->Peb->BeingDebugged = TRUE;
> +                    }
> +                    _SEH_HANDLE
> +                    {
> +                      DPRINT1("Trying to set the Peb->BeingDebugged field of
> process 0x%x failed, exception: 0x%x\n", Process, _SEH_GetExceptionCode());
> +                    }
> +                    _SEH_END;
>   
>
>                      KeDetachProcess();
>                    }
>                    Status = STATUS_SUCCESS;
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
I apologize if I'm being flat-out clueless here, but do we really want 
to return STATUS_SUCCESS when we failed to set the field in question?