[hbelusca] 73529: [SHLWAPI]: On Windows 2003, tests show that strings starting with "\\?" are considered UNC, while on Windows Vista+ this is not the case anymore. Select Win2k3 behaviour: revert r...

Author: hbelusca
Date: Fri Jan 13 00:18:51 2017
New Revision: 73529

URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=73529&view=rev
Log:
[SHLWAPI]: On Windows 2003, tests show that strings starting with "\\?" are
considered UNC, while on Windows Vista+ this is not the case anymore.
Select Win2k3 behaviour: revert r54542 (and add a note).
CORE-12653 #resolve

Modified:
    trunk/reactos/dll/win32/shlwapi/path.c

Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/shlwapi/path.c
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/shlwapi/path.c?r…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/dll/win32/shlwapi/path.c	[iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/dll/win32/shlwapi/path.c	[iso-8859-1] Fri Jan 13 00:18:51 2017
@@ -2197,7 +2197,12 @@
 {
   TRACE("(%s)\n",debugstr_a(lpszPath));
 
-#ifdef __REACTOS__
+/*
+ * On Windows 2003, tests show that strings starting with "\\?" are
+ * considered UNC, while on Windows Vista+ this is not the case anymore.
+ */
+// #ifdef __REACTOS__
+#if 0
   if (lpszPath && (lpszPath[0]=='\\') &&
(lpszPath[1]=='\\') && (lpszPath[2]!='?'))
 #else
   if (lpszPath && (lpszPath[0]=='\\') &&
(lpszPath[1]=='\\'))
@@ -2215,7 +2220,12 @@
 {
   TRACE("(%s)\n",debugstr_w(lpszPath));
 
-#ifdef __REACTOS__
+/*
+ * On Windows 2003, tests show that strings starting with "\\?" are
+ * considered UNC, while on Windows Vista+ this is not the case anymore.
+ */
+// #ifdef __REACTOS__
+#if 0
   if (lpszPath && (lpszPath[0]=='\\') &&
(lpszPath[1]=='\\') && (lpszPath[2]!='?'))
 #else
   if (lpszPath && (lpszPath[0]=='\\') &&
(lpszPath[1]=='\\'))