Author: fireball Date: Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008 New Revision: 32302
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=32302&view=rev Log: - Minor cleanup. See issue #3054 for more details.
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c?rev=3... ============================================================================== --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c (original) +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008 @@ -542,10 +542,6 @@ * PAGE_EXECUTE_READ, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, PAGE_GUARD, * PAGE_NOACCESS * RETURNS: Status - * NOTES: Must run at IRQL PASSIVE_LEVEL? (or is APC_LEVEL cool too?) - * MSDN states that ZwAllocateVirtualMemory IRQL must be PASSIVE_LEVEL, - * but why wouldn't APC_LEVEL be valid (or is that only for the Zw* version - * and Nt* can indeed run at APC_LEVEL?) */ { PEPROCESS Process; @@ -561,10 +557,7 @@ PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BoundaryAddressMultiple; KPROCESSOR_MODE PreviousMode;
- // TMN: Someone Pick one of these. Until it's clear which - // level is allowed, I play it safe and check for <= APC_LEVEL PAGED_CODE(); -// ASSERT(KeGetCurrentIrql() == PASSIVE_LEVEL);
DPRINT("NtAllocateVirtualMemory(*UBaseAddress %x, " "ZeroBits %d, *URegionSize %x, AllocationType %x, Protect %x)\n",
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c?rev=3... ============================================================================== --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c (original) +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008 @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ szDest = Process->ImageFileName; lnFName = min(lnFName, sizeof(Process->ImageFileName) - 1); while (lnFName--) *szDest++ = (UCHAR)*szSrc++; - *szDest = UNICODE_NULL; + *szDest = ANSI_NULL;
/* Check if caller wants an audit name */ if (AuditName)