Author: fireball
Date: Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008
New Revision: 32302
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=32302&view=rev
Log:
- Minor cleanup.
See issue #3054 for more details.
Modified:
trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c
trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c?rev=…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/anonmem.c Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008
@@ -542,10 +542,6 @@
* PAGE_EXECUTE_READ, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, PAGE_GUARD,
* PAGE_NOACCESS
* RETURNS: Status
- * NOTES: Must run at IRQL PASSIVE_LEVEL? (or is APC_LEVEL cool too?)
- * MSDN states that ZwAllocateVirtualMemory IRQL must be PASSIVE_LEVEL,
- * but why wouldn't APC_LEVEL be valid (or is that only for the Zw* version
- * and Nt* can indeed run at APC_LEVEL?)
*/
{
PEPROCESS Process;
@@ -561,10 +557,7 @@
PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BoundaryAddressMultiple;
KPROCESSOR_MODE PreviousMode;
- // TMN: Someone Pick one of these. Until it's clear which
- // level is allowed, I play it safe and check for <= APC_LEVEL
PAGED_CODE();
-// ASSERT(KeGetCurrentIrql() == PASSIVE_LEVEL);
DPRINT("NtAllocateVirtualMemory(*UBaseAddress %x, "
"ZeroBits %d, *URegionSize %x, AllocationType %x, Protect %x)\n",
Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c?rev=…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/procsup.c Mon Feb 11 20:45:56 2008
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@
szDest = Process->ImageFileName;
lnFName = min(lnFName, sizeof(Process->ImageFileName) - 1);
while (lnFName--) *szDest++ = (UCHAR)*szSrc++;
- *szDest = UNICODE_NULL;
+ *szDest = ANSI_NULL;
/* Check if caller wants an audit name */
if (AuditName)