Curtis Spivey wrote
> I'm curious, what format did you use to install it using VMware? It
> doesn't really fit in any of the standard categories. I think that's
> the route I may go.
It doesn't matter. Just stick it under XP and make sure you use a Fat32
disk.
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
I'm just curious how most folks are running ReacOS? I mean are you
running it on an old laptop or as a secondary boot system or as a
stand alone system, ect. I'm just curious. I know it's still in the
experimental stages.
--
Curtis
Nampa, Idaho
http://pcs.freepay.com/?r=24984191
I just released 0.2.9 to sf.net. A lot of bug fixes since RC1 so get
out there and check it out. File any bugs in in bugzilla or give us any
feedback on the ml.
Brandon
> From: David Hinz
> Sounds like a good idea, but I think we should use the existing
> ReactOS.xml (if you have one...), so we don't need to create a new
> file for this.
We have version.h for this. This way it's easily included via the
pre-processor
I've taken the [ros-dev] out of the subject as my mail filter was getting
confused.
Ged
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Well, I'm fine with it, but some other people seem to have problems with
this system, so I thought of something without any sense, just numbers.
Like the build-numbers every MS-product has, e.g. Win XP has the
build-number 2600
I would be more for a mix of a lot of different systems.
Create daily technology preview, that don't need to be "perfect", if
they compile fine, they can be released. This would be the ones with the
buildnumbers.
Then there were monthly releases, or maybe a release every month with
the current numbering system, but also with buildnumbers.
And then we have the releases with codenames.
So as an example this all could look like this:
02.01.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0001 r20500
09.01.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0002 r20619
16.01.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0003 r20681
23.01.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0004 r20834
30.01.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0005 r21001
...
20.02.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0008 r21517
27.02.2006: Release 0.2.10: Build 0009 r21687
06.03.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0010 r21755
...
...
17.04.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0016 r22033
24.04.2006: Release 0.3.0: Build 0017 r22177 Codename God knows
01.05.2006: Technology Preview: Build 0018 r22257
You see, I would choose a weekly release plan.
The whole organisation on SVN would look a bit like this:
We have trunk, which would be our unstable tree.
Then we have our testing tree, which always has to compile fine and
should at least boot and install fine too.
This branch would be feature freezed for one day every week, and after
this the Technology Preview would be released.
In addition, the ordinary two monthly releases would be created out of
this branch, we would just feature freeze it for a whole week and the
last 3 days of the week it would be codefreezed, so on the whole it
would be feature freezed for 8 days (including the one day before the
last Technology Preview) and of this 8 days it would be code freezed for
3 days (the last 3 days before the release).
So an ordinary release would be a Technology Preview, but in the week
before its release the branch would be handled a bit differently than in
other weeks.
I hope I didn't confuse you all too much, but for me this seems like a
good idea.
Comments are highly appreciated.
Greets,
David Hinz
TwoTailedFox schrieb:
> 0.2.9 not good enough as a Version Number?
>
> On 12/18/05, David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was talking about numbering the releases...
>>
>> TwoTailedFox schrieb:
>>> We have SVN Numbers o.o
>>>
>>> On 12/18/05, David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why don't we use buildnumbers?
>>>> Without any sense, just counting a number up and creating some major
>>>> releases with names from time to time.
>>>>
>>>> Just an idea...
>>>>
>>>> Greets,
>>>>
>>>> David Hinz
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> "I had a handle on life, but then it broke"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> From: David Hinz
>
> Why don't we use buildnumbers?
> Without any sense, just counting a number up and creating
> some major releases with names from time to time.
[moved from ros-dev]
OSnews headline: "ReactOS project released build r20273". Doesn't have the
same ring to it as "ReactOS project released 0.2.9". I still fail to see
what the problem is with the current system. If it ain't broke, don't fix
it.
GvG
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 11:50 +0100, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
> Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 17:19 +0100, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
> >
> >>Are you saying that with Vista it's possible to give a program its own
> >>virtual view of the system which it can read and modify to its heart's
> >>content without affecting other programs? That would be simply divine.
> >
> > Yes, although IME, it doesn't work out so well, yet.
> >
> > I just posted on that in this thread, as well. There are more bad
> > things that happen as a result.
>
> Apart from obvious problems with giving users enough rights to do common
> tasks, which isn't something I'm terribly worried about in my situation
> (I'm pretty much the only one who should be doing anything mildly
> advanced anyway), could you point out something that goes wrong? I'd
> assume that if an application has its own virtual view of the filesystem
> and registry (that it could read and potentially modify) that most
> applications would work reasonably well.
Well, for starters:
* Applications which previously had settings in other places didn't
work so well because of the new "virtualization" technique.
* Things like Nero didn't work at all without new software (similar to
a sudo sort of thing for Windows, but a bigger pain in the ass to
install and manage).
* Computer Administrators weren't administrators, so the Control Panels
didn't work.
* Trying to run anything that requested a low-level access of any type
didn't work very well. This included the special config programs that
came with my video board and sound card. The programs would load, but
none of their functionality would work.
In addition:
* Some programs are now 'hard-wired' to use locations like C:\Documents
and Settings\current_user. This is not present any longer in Vista.
This should probably be a bug against the application, however, since %
USERHOME% (I think) is defined stating where the user's home area is.
The new area is %SYSTEMDRIVE%\Users\current_user, or something like
that.
* Vista is most assuredly not well versed in the upgrade from "legacy"
Windows (e.g., XP) to itself. It didn't work. It didn't virtualize the
registry as it should've. This is something that hopefully they fix
soon.
* Something changed in the way you can store temp files, even. This
was fairly evident by the fact that some things (such as program
installers) failed to run as anything but the Administrator. That was
HIGHLY annoying.
* I couldn't uninstall programs that I'd installed under my user
account in XP, under Vista.
It's almost like having no rights, whatsoever. At least with UNIX, it's
all good game if you stay in your home directory and don't exceed your
disk quota, and play by the rules of the system set by the SA.
- Mike
--
Michael B. Trausch fd0man(a)gmail.com
"Why geeks like computers: unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount,
fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep." :-)
Michael B. Trausch schrieb:
> In any case, I'm not sure if its very feasible to have a monitor look
> for low-level requests and audit them saying "x requests are permitted
> and the rest aren't" - but I'm not sure. That could probably be
> something akin to a network firewall, but only for internal system I/O.
I don't know, if this is possible, but afaik Windows denies access to
some things for ordinary users. This is good so far (okay, it's not
restrictive enough...) but Windows is laking the dialog asking you for a
password.
Comments on this by some of the devs would be very appreciated...
Greets,
David Hinz