Hi Richard,
While I agree with your general statement (I don't run an
antivirus/firewall myself for the same reasons), your argument and
reasoning is flawed. You are assuming that all exploits that exist
are patched. They are not. In fact, if you're running Windows XP
patched with the latest available updates and have your RPC port open
(you probably do), I can crack your machine -right now-. Without a
firewall nothing will stop my exploit packet from reaching you; there
is no published vulnerability for this bug. Do you use IE? I know of
4 unpatched bugs still in IE6 today that aren't "in the wild". One of
them can be used to crack your system after going on a web-page. Once
again, without a firewall, you'll get infected (even with one you
will, but the payload wouldn't be able to do anything).
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
Richard Campbell wrote:
That's your opinion.
Do you know that on this box i've never run a firewall or a virus
scanner? Occasionally i'll run a web based scanner to check
suspicious files, etc. but i've never found need for a
firewall/virus scanner. As long as you stay up to date and don't
run questionable files you are fine. A firewall is not NEEDED as
long as the OS is properly configured and working.
Richard
Ged Murphy wrote:
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org