Ge van Geldorp wrote:
You are right. Actually, the main problem comes from a few percentage of non-GPL compatible code, some of them are propitery or some are not compatible with GPL policy. But basically those sources came from some other projects and not coded/written by our devs. I personally was afraid to publish these sources publicly without owners written permission. And due to the fact, team was confused to publish the source tree. But Geldorf, I can assure you more than 100% about its cleanliness and there is NO LEAKED SOURCES FROM WINDOWS/WINDOWS 2000.
Sorry Geldorf, I cannot write more for now as I'm going to outside and will be back tomorrow. I'll come with more clarifications when back.
Thanks and regards,
Refaz Anam Lianasoft Foundation
lol that's a good joke. This guy pretends to be a lawyer - and yes, that's what lawyers do/agree with: Pirate binaries from Microsoft and fake copyright. Sure, how can one be sure they didn't use leaked sources (even though I doubt they wrote anything apart from some minor GUI changes)...
Thomas