Issue 0. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

When I do finally get the message that I am not welcome then I will announce my departure 
here.
My Mission:
Is to create a new Machine Language which is a manifold  of all the other Machine
languages. [see wikipedia "hello world"]
I will give the Machine a means to identify concience, i.e. be apperceptive.
I may call it Zero++ (just kidding).
It will be pretty much as useless as I am a sick, retired person.
But it will actually enable  the first step which "begins the longest march".
It is also called the Copernican Revolution.
Simple because it, in itSelf, is not a step  toward anything else.
It is not and Object toward which the step is Oriented i.e. has Objective validity.
It has only one property i.e. Magnitude. and Degree.
And aSubject i.e. mySelf
It is not described by the Cartesian Cogito " I THINK therefore I AM"
Which began the sequence called Enlightenment.
But with "I AM therefore I THINK".
I am a former metal worker cum programmer cum user.
In order for me to have worth I have separated out the Users from the Programmers.
Each has their own separate issues.
Already I find the Programmers are questioning the right of a User to know nothing about
Programming and find it clever to take an ignorant User question and lead into a trivial
deadend, thereby exhausting the ignorant User.
This practice of killing by confusion is a common practice and is called OBFUSCATION.
Microsoft is perfecting the technique whilst stimulating the spread of "code
farms".
I will not be confused.
I will confine such heretical statements to this thread.
That way I am easily identified.
The "devil you know is better than the devil you don't know".

Rosuccess
Justin



>   Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 6:36:31 +1000
>  From: "jwalsh(a)bigpond.net.au" <jwalsh(a)bigpond.net.au>
>  To: ReactOS General List <ros-general(a)reactos.org>
>  Subject: Re: Issue 3. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]
>  Cc: David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com>
>  
>  Thanks David.
>  
>  That is what I am trying to figure out  myself.
>  It was the rare courtesy I found here, which has kept me here this long.
>  
>  That appears to be running out, now that it is discovered I don't blindly follow the
> dictates of leaders. It's an Australian obsession.
>  
>  The answers I need to get go beyond the mere "Part Fabrication" or the
> "Componant Assembly". I've done my time in industry and retired, a slave no
> longer.
>  
>  I need to know this:  Will I actually be working for Microsoft? For nothing?
>   
>  As I said from the outset, I'm  here only because I see the writing on the wall for
> 9x.
>  
>  My ISP has sent all of us a blunt eviction (by stealth) notice, otherwise, I like most
> other simple DOS  users, am more than  happy with what I have already.
>  They also said  their policy is conditioned by Microsoft.
>  I don't really need NT. Is it something I have got to have?
>  
>  However it seems that no reason at all need be given, by reactOS, why we must relocate to
> NT (irrespective of whether it is FAt or not).
>  Its a strange attitude for a socalled free organisation.
>  
>  So I guess  by stalling for time I might elicite from the Ros-Users a credible answer.
>  I'm definately not stalking or trolling. 
>  
>  I am carefull not to put a lot of energy into a "Code Farm", for the large
> corporations (to my knowledge M$  invented the practice, I've merely identified it). 
>
>  
>  I still wish you all Good Cheer and a rosuccess.
>  
>  Thanks for the opportunity
>  
>  Justin
>  
>  
>  
>  ---- David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote: 
> >   _______________________________________________
> >  ros-general mailing list
> >  ros-general(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general 
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  ros-general mailing list
>  ros-general(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general