OK Richard, Now I understand ( I think). I have a choice to start that "other project" or find it. Well for the benefit of the listeners I have started it. In the interests of [ros-general] please consider UAPI closed. Any private suggestions are welcome. Thanks and rosSuccess. Justin
---- Richard Campbell eek2121@comcast.net wrote:
Last i checked, the ROS design isn't designed to correct anything. It is designed to be a drop in replacement for Windows NT, 2000, XP that is compatible with applicatons and drivers. It is then up to other projects to mod that as they see fit.
Richard
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
jwalsh@bigpond.net.au wrote:
The Original Windows is having anormous problems fighting off Virus and Malware. It is known that it's vunerability is builtin to its original design i.e. the TSR. Where does the ROS current design correct that inherent problem?
If we can't run viruses designed for windows (except those exploiting bugs), the level of compatibility is rather low...
If ROS is short staffed now how bad is it going to get, if and when things do take off.
We're not going to have an OS that I would consider stable in the near future. There are bugs and flaws everywhere you look, kind of the same problem that wine has.
If a multi billion dollar enterprise cannot stop it how can ROS stop it? This is not a trivial question.
Money can't fix everything, sometimes better decisions would help.
- Thomas
ros-general mailing list ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
ros-general mailing list ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general