Last i checked, the ROS design isn't designed to
correct anything. It
is designed to be a drop in replacement for Windows NT, 2000, XP that is
compatible with applicatons and drivers. It is then up to other
projects to mod that as they see fit.
Richard
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
jwalsh(a)bigpond.net.au wrote:
The Original Windows is having anormous problems
fighting off Virus and Malware.
It is known that it's vunerability is builtin to its original design i.e. the TSR.
Where does the ROS current design correct that inherent problem?
If we can't run viruses designed for windows (except those exploiting
bugs), the level of compatibility is rather low...
If ROS is short staffed now how bad is it going to
get, if and when things do take off.
We're not going to have an OS that I would consider stable in the near
future. There are bugs and flaws everywhere you look, kind of the same
problem that wine has.
If a multi billion dollar enterprise cannot stop
it how can ROS stop it?
This is not a trivial question.
Money can't fix everything, sometimes better decisions would help.
- Thomas
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org