Re: Issue 3. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

Thanks David.

That is what I am trying to figure out  myself.
It was the rare courtesy I found here, which has kept me here this long.

That appears to be running out, now that it is discovered I don't blindly follow the
dictates of leaders. It's an Australian obsession.

The answers I need to get go beyond the mere "Part Fabrication" or the
"Componant Assembly". I've done my time in industry and retired, a slave no
longer.

I need to know this:  Will I actually be working for Microsoft? For nothing?
 
As I said from the outset, I'm  here only because I see the writing on the wall for
9x.

My ISP has sent all of us a blunt eviction (by stealth) notice, otherwise, I like most
other simple DOS  users, am more than  happy with what I have already.
They also said  their policy is conditioned by Microsoft.
I don't really need NT. Is it something I have got to have?

However it seems that no reason at all need be given, by reactOS, why we must relocate to
NT (irrespective of whether it is FAt or not).
Its a strange attitude for a socalled free organisation.

So I guess  by stalling for time I might elicite from the Ros-Users a credible answer.
I'm definately not stalking or trolling. 

I am carefull not to put a lot of energy into a "Code Farm", for the large
corporations (to my knowledge M$  invented the practice, I've merely identified it). 


I still wish you all Good Cheer and a rosuccess.

Thanks for the opportunity

Justin



---- David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote: 
>   _______________________________________________
>  ros-general mailing list
>  ros-general(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general