16 Oct
2005
16 Oct
'05
11:25 a.m.
Mikko - maybe you could make up your own guidelines? And I'm sure mf
would love to include your best thoughts into the Icon Submission
document.
I really don't see any personal in the guidelines, except for that
they are kind of strict. But providing example - do you want to
commit ugly hacks into the kernel, or get a good patch done (though
it requires a little more time usually)?
Please don't take this into personal "mf vs. crappish" fight again.
Provide constructive critic, provide ideas...
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Oct 16, 2005, at 3:31 AM, Mikko Tikkanen wrote:
Well, quite frankly, you could do that a WHOLE lot
nicer way. If you
have to state publicly that if you are not professional stay away or
get bashed then you are heading the wrong way. You could have wrote
simple instructions for the people wanting to help, instead you wrote
how good you are, how much you have done and how you are going to bash
anyone who tries to submit anything. No matter how I watch that it
just isn't constructive. You could have proposed something like icon
submission board where certain people could just vote if they like
certain icon or not, ergo making your life easier, but again you
didn't.. You just decided to bash the people who are TRYING to help.
Now, on to the trashcan: No, I am not talking about looks. I think
they look ok for now. To be more on the point, that is the same exact
mistake Apple did while ago. (Yes, they make mistakes) The problem
here lies in psychology; The trashcan displays an state of immediate
explosion even though single text document would be placed in it, so
natural response would be to empty the trash hence disabling the very
function of trash can: undo. Plus, it changes the single step function
(delete) to two step function (delete, empty trash).
-mikko
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general