Okay, just a thought, these prices would never change, and a fellow dev has physical access to the machine, but at any rate...i had to offer.
Jason Filby wrote:
Hi Richard
On point 2, as Ge has mentioned, we have physical access to our boxen
now - and everything is available at no cost to the project. I prefer
this even if the hardware offered at a cost from a hosting company is
superior because these companies can change their mind on the prices at any time and because of the freedom we have with physical access. But
thanks for checking it out!
Cheers Jason
Richard Campbell wrote:
Okay guys, i have a couple points to make and a couple questions to
ask.
- I propose that we move all common dlls used by both wine and
ROS to
a seperate repository or module and maybe overhaul them and work on
a
common build system that will work for both the WINE and ReactOS projects, as well as other open source projects that need these
files.
What do you guys think of this idea? Think we could get the WINE people's support?
- CVS and webhosting, rex, jason, whoever else, can you give me
an
idea of how much bandwidth per month CVS and the reactos websites consume? I might have a possible hosting solution we can
use...(OC12,
p4 1.8, 1 gb RAM rackmount), the only snag is, depending on how
much
bandwidth the combined total uses, we'd have to come up with
$10-$30/mo
to help pay for the solution. Is this a viable option?
- can someone please commit the win32api build needed to build
ROS to
a module in CVS?
ros-general mailing list
ros-general@reactos.com
Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ ros-general mailing list ros-general@reactos.com http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general