RE: [ros-general] Microsoft wants royalties for use of FAT

[Jens Collin]

What if MS descides to patent their drivers-api so that one can't create
anything that can use drivers written for Windows/their api. Then the whole
idea about driver compability is down the drain, right?
Just thought of this as an extension to the FAT patent-problem.

/ Jens

-----Original Message-----
From: ros-general-bounces(a)reactos.com
[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Vizzini
Sent: den 5 december 2003 18:11
To: ros-general(a)reactos.com
Subject: Re: [ros-general] Microsoft wants royalties for use of FAT


On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 16:03, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
>   http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp
I had a discussion with a patent lawyer who confirmed that anyone who makes,
sells, offers to sell, or ***uses*** a patented invention (device, process,
etc) is infringing on that patent.

End users can and do get sued, and developers can get sued too.  You can
find examples of end-users getting sued if you search around a bit.

We need to formulate a policy as it relates to IP, probably pretty quickly.

 -Vizzini


_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.com http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general