RE: [ros-general] Why??

[Murphy, Ged (Bolton)]

>   From: David Hinz 
>  Sounds like a good idea, but I think we should use the existing
>  ReactOS.xml (if you have one...), so we don't need to create a new
>  file for this. 
We have version.h for this. This way it's easily included via the
pre-processor

I've taken the [ros-dev] out of the subject as my mail filter was getting
confused.

Ged

************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk 
<mailto:[e-mail]> and then delete this message. 

Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com

[David Hinz]

Well, first of all, I did a little mistake, I wanted to write 
config.xml, not ReactOS.xml, as I noticed there is a small difference...

But the problem stays the same, in my oppinion we should maintain all 
these settings in one file, it doesn't matter if it is a xml or h file, 
but all variables should be in one file.

I just looked into these two files, and maybe we should create a 
release.xml, which contains the release mode (sets the look and feel of 
certain dialogs, and the dbg and kdbg vars), the version, release 
number, build number, release name and so on, some of these settings 
depend on the release mode, as a release name isn't available for a 
technology preview (maybe it just says Technology Preview), but the 
whole thing has to be worked out a bit more carefully. Just my ideas...

Greets,

David Hinz

Murphy, Ged (Bolton) schrieb:
> >   From: David
> > Hinz 
> >  Sounds like a good idea, but I think we should use the existing
> >  ReactOS.xml (if you have one...), so we don't need to create a new
> >  file for this. 
>  
>  We have version.h for this. This way it's easily included via the
>  pre-processor
>  
>  I've taken the [ros-dev] out of the subject as my mail filter was getting
>  confused.
>  
>  Ged