Thanks, nLite - another interesting one.
It seems as if I am going to have a busy day !
Kevin.
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-general-bounces(a)reactos.org
[mailto:ros-general-bounces@reactos.org]On Behalf Of TwoTailedFox
Sent: 20 October 2005 11:05
To: ReactOS General List
Subject: Re: [ros-general] OK, Time for a few words..
Kevin, if you're looking to slim down Windows 2000 (Or XP/2003, for
that matter), check out nLite:
http://www.nliteos.com
On 10/20/05, Kevin Lawton <kepla(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
I had not heard of this 'LitePC' thing
before - it sounds
almost too good to be true.
Thanks for the info - I will be giving it a try
to trim my Win
2000 installations down to a more sensible size.
Been down the Linux road too but, when you
consider the current
bulkiness of the more 'useful' Linux distros and the
difficulties
of using it with modern toys like phones or cameras, I find I
have to keep Windows hanging around - at least until ReactOS is
'all present and correct'. FreeBSD is an interesting option for
Unix-like-ness on a PC, with Cygwin and Win4Lin having their place too.
Dunno about ros-insane, maybe it should be
ros-inspired.
Plenty of new things to play with now. :-)
Kevin.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ros-general-bounces(a)reactos.org
> [mailto:ros-general-bounces@reactos.org]On Behalf Of
> jwalsh(a)bigpond.net.au
> Sent: 20 October 2005 05:08
> To: ReactOS General List
> Cc: Robert Köpferl
> Subject: Re: [ros-general] OK, Time for a few words..
>
>
>
> If I may add my 2 cents worth.
> I too have a spot in my heart for Linux Gui's, both KDE and Gnome.
> However the overheads are too high. So I have 3 three Thinkspads
> on the net.
> and a comfortable swivel chair.
> IMHO Linux is toooo fat and slow and badly designed, before I get
> flamed it is only MHO.
> So I have tried to compromise (on Particulars, not on Principles).
> This was my strategy (for what it is worth):
> Please remember it is only MHO, and not set in concrete.
> I chose the first Linux distro off the block i.e. Slackware
> because it stuck to basic principles. Yes as simple as that. The
> old 1440 KB floppy disk (about the size of my limited imagination).
> I chose a basic Windows32 platform i.e. 9x
> Then I worked on the tiny Linux's (Monkey Linux, and pocket Linux)
> Until I discovered Pat Villani's :
> Linux for Windows 9X
> Home page:
http://www.monmouth.com/user_pages/patv/
> Download:
>
ftp://opensourcedepot.com/pub/linux/WinLin9X/v0.2/setup.exe
> Author: Pat Villani (
http://www.monmouth.com/user_pages/patv)
> Mailing list: lin4win(a)opensourcedepot.com
> It was great, it sat neatly in 18 MB.
> Then I asked myself, "what the heck am I doing with nearly half a
> gig of Windows98se?"
> Not wanting to bring Microsoft down on my financially poor head:
> I downloaded Australian product called 98Lite from
LitePC.com
> (trial version)
> I liked it so much I bought the real thing.
> It gave me the opportunity to unbolt everything which Microsoft
> told the courts was not possible to do.
> There she was, stripped from nearly half a gig to 50mb, stark
> naked, but looking like Homer Simpson.
> The speed increase was fantastic. Now I am going for 30 mb, then
> 16, then 8, then .......
> The full story would take too long to tell, so I will leave
it at that.
> Suffice to say I have now dumped Linux and
gone back to Unix
BSD and bash.
> That is when met Minsys and it was a good
feeling.
> I was Bourne again, bash'ed about the head, so to speak.
> Oh I forgot there is a need for one extra doorway off ros-general
> especially for me.
> Mark it ros-insane.
>
> Cheers and rosuccess
>
> Justin
>
> ---- "Robert Köpferl" <rob(a)koepferl.de> wrote:
> > Hhmmm, what you tink of is what I call a GDI-Port+win32 of xfree.
> > etc
> > Richard Campbell wrote:
> > > XFree86 has already been ported to windows, whats the point
> in a ROS port?
> > > etc
> > > Robert Köpferl wrote:
> > > etc
> > >> It should be possible to port Xfree86 to ROS (be it win32 or
> posix) as
> > >> it has been proted to os2.
> > >>etc
> > >> TwoTailedFox wrote:
> > >> etc
> > >>> I've seen quite a few users propose ideas, such as a
new GUI, or new
>>> functionality, only to be told it
doesn't fit in with the
Core Goal of
>>> ReactOS.
>>> etc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-general mailing list
>>> ros-general(a)reactos.org
>>>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-general mailing list
>> ros-general(a)reactos.org
>>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general(a)reactos.org
>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"
_______________________________________________
ros-general mailing list
ros-general(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general