Re: [ros-general] why folks

[James Tabor]

KJK::Hyperion wrote:
>   At 22.46 18/02/2004, you wrote:
>  
> >   (no idea about hyperion's motives to react
> > the way he does) 
>  
>  
>  Normally here I'd spew some witticisms, collect the applause, bow and go 
>  home. I'll try, instead, to (gasp!) rationalize. Let's say I ask you 
>  "are you eterosexual?", and after you reply I ask you, with the 
>  straightest face, "why?", and won't take "because" as a reply
> (because, 
>  hey, you've invested your whole life on your sexual orientation, and 
>  you're telling me you put no planning or risk assessment in the 
>  choice?). How would *you* react? 
LOL! Oh my!

Everyone leave Hyperion alone,
James