At 21.54 29/02/2004, you wrote:
I am strictly _against_ sharing code between dlls, or ntoskrnl and ntdll.
the directory listing of the leaked Windows sources
to make things clear: I have *not* downloaded or otherwise obtained said sources. The listing was posted on a site and linked to on the Slashdot story about the leakage, and I took some time to examine it to tell if it could be genuine, and to catch something interesting if it was (I did find something interesting, and it was the proof that NtUserXxx/NtGdiXxx aren't considered real system calls, but rather glue code, like before I only knew by heart, and like I have speculated in the past on the mailing lists)