Hi!
Effective immediately I am taking a break from working on ReactOS for an undetermined period of time. It may even be the end of my involvement with ReactOS.
There are several reasons for me to quit but the most important one is lack of time. I have a pretty exhausting job and spend more than 2 hours a day to commute so there is not much time left to spend on ReactOS. So working on ReactOS happened on weekends only.
After my latest patch was partially reverted, I decided that I am not willing to create and maintain a development branch for improvements to LSA and SAM. I am not willing to spend an hour or two each weekend for branch maintenance and debugging and another two or three hours for developing new code. It just does not make sense to me.
Maybe I will be back one day, maybe I will not. Time will tell.
Over and out! Eric
I completely agree, your code should never have been reverted. As you know, this isn't the first time we've been through this, and I'm sure it won't be the last.
You'll be sorely missed. It's always sad to see the core devs leave.
Ged.
-----Original Message----- From: ros-general-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-general-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kohl Sent: 16 December 2008 20:47 To: ros-general@reactos.org Subject: [ros-general] I am taking a break...
Hi!
Effective immediately I am taking a break from working on ReactOS for an undetermined period of time. It may even be the end of my involvement with ReactOS.
There are several reasons for me to quit but the most important one is lack of time. I have a pretty exhausting job and spend more than 2 hours a day to commute so there is not much time left to spend on ReactOS. So working on ReactOS happened on weekends only.
After my latest patch was partially reverted, I decided that I am not willing to create and maintain a development branch for improvements to LSA and SAM. I am not willing to spend an hour or two each weekend for branch maintenance and debugging and another two or three hours for developing new code. It just does not make sense to me.
Maybe I will be back one day, maybe I will not. Time will tell.
Over and out! Eric
_______________________________________________ Ros-general mailing list Ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
Eric, the revert was temporary because of a problem in PSEH2, not with your code. Stefan did say it was temporary, but he didn't really explain why in the commit message and he also didn't contact you directly, which in hindsight is what he should have done first before reverting. So this is very much a case of bad communication within the project.
Hi Eric! Eric Kohl wrote:
Hi!
Effective immediately I am taking a break from working on ReactOS for an undetermined period of time. It may even be the end of my involvement with ReactOS.
There are several reasons for me to quit but the most important one is lack of time. I have a pretty exhausting job and spend more than 2 hours a day to commute so there is not much time left to spend on ReactOS. So working on ReactOS happened on weekends only.
After my latest patch was partially reverted, I decided that I am not willing to create and maintain a development branch for improvements to LSA and SAM. I am not willing to spend an hour or two each weekend for branch maintenance and debugging and another two or three hours for developing new code. It just does not make sense to me.
Maybe I will be back one day, maybe I will not. Time will tell.
Over and out! Eric
Your resignation is disapproved! You are an integral part of this project.
You are the last of the root members of this project. We need your help and if that means breaking ReactOS truck that is your right to do so. We will learn to live with it. I have followed your work for years and I would like to see you more. Based on your tenure with this project, this gives you rights, influences and guidance to this project.
Please recommence with your changes, James
I concur with James.
Eric, I think what you meant to say is you don't have time to work on ReactOS in its current state -- ie: the slow, time-consuming procedures and behaviors that take up more than 50% of your free time.
What if ReactOS provides you with your own branch, and the ReactOS project assumes the responsibility of merging your changes to trunk, performing the testing and regression testing. You might be afraid that your code will "rot" and that it would never make it inline, but I'm sure the people respect your work as much as I do and would make sure that things stay up to date (much like we sync with Wine).
This would allow you to keep committing code, have your own branch which at least works for you, and we'd take care of merging. Your only real responsibility would be to "sync up" with trunk every once in a while -- could even be only ever 3 months, or if you notice something obvious that might affect you (RPC changes, WIDL changes, SCM etc).
I know this may sound unfair to other developers, but as James pointed out, you deserve everyone's time, considering how much you've put in all this time.
On 19-Dec-08, at 9:22 PM, James Tabor wrote:
Hi Eric! Eric Kohl wrote:
Hi!
Effective immediately I am taking a break from working on ReactOS for an undetermined period of time. It may even be the end of my involvement with ReactOS.
There are several reasons for me to quit but the most important one is lack of time. I have a pretty exhausting job and spend more than 2 hours a day to commute so there is not much time left to spend on ReactOS. So working on ReactOS happened on weekends only.
After my latest patch was partially reverted, I decided that I am not willing to create and maintain a development branch for improvements to LSA and SAM. I am not willing to spend an hour or two each weekend for branch maintenance and debugging and another two or three hours for developing new code. It just does not make sense to me.
Maybe I will be back one day, maybe I will not. Time will tell.
Over and out! Eric
Your resignation is disapproved! You are an integral part of this project.
You are the last of the root members of this project. We need your help and if that means breaking ReactOS truck that is your right to do so. We will learn to live with it. I have followed your work for years and I would like to see you more. Based on your tenure with this project, this gives you rights, influences and guidance to this project.
Please recommence with your changes, James _______________________________________________ Ros-general mailing list Ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
Best regards, Alex Ionescu
James Tabor:
You are the last of the root members of this project. We need your help and if that means breaking ReactOS truck that is your right to do so. We
will
learn to live with it. I have followed your work for years and I would
like
to see you more. Based on your tenure with this project, this gives you rights, influences and guidance to this project.
I completely agree with James. Some people in this project hold more respect and rights to it. Considering you're one of the fathers of ReactOS, and the amount of effort you've put in, the project can certainly accommodate your needs in order to keep you on the team.
Ged.
It seems he is not reading this. He must have responded by now. Sorry about this but I'm a newb... if he leaves then is reactOS dead?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Ged gedmurphy@gmail.com wrote:
James Tabor:
You are the last of the root members of this project. We need your help and if that means breaking ReactOS truck that is your right to do so. We
will
learn to live with it. I have followed your work for years and I would
like
to see you more. Based on your tenure with this project, this gives you rights, influences and guidance to this project.
I completely agree with James. Some people in this project hold more respect and rights to it. Considering you're one of the fathers of ReactOS, and the amount of effort you've put in, the project can certainly accommodate your needs in order to keep you on the team.
Ged.
Ros-general mailing list Ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
Maybe Microsoft made him a deal he could not refuse
Ray
Patrick Lopez wrote:
It seems he is not reading this. He must have responded by now. Sorry about this but I'm a newb... if he leaves then is reactOS dead?
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Ged <gedmurphy@gmail.com mailto:gedmurphy@gmail.com> wrote:
James Tabor: > You are the last of the root members of this project. We need your help > and if that means breaking ReactOS truck that is your right to do so. We will > learn to live with it. I have followed your work for years and I would like > to see you more. Based on your tenure with this project, this gives you > rights, influences and guidance to this project. I completely agree with James. Some people in this project hold more respect and rights to it. Considering you're one of the fathers of ReactOS, and the amount of effort you've put in, the project can certainly accommodate your needs in order to keep you on the team. Ged. _______________________________________________ Ros-general mailing list Ros-general@reactos.org <mailto:Ros-general@reactos.org> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
Ros-general mailing list Ros-general@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
Patrick Lopez wrote:
It seems he is not reading this. He must have responded by now. Sorry about this but I'm a newb... if he leaves then is reactOS dead?
I don't think so. Some members of the dev team who have historical importance do hold also important roles in the project, but not all of them. I think they are concerned about his historical role, which is fair (i suppose so). There's no reason for ROS to come to an end because one of the devs leaves (at least not directly and as long as most of them stay active).
JJ __________________________________________________ Fa�a liga��es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/