Explorer progress

[Ge van Geldorp]

For those of you who haven't followed the progress with Explorer
closely, take a look at http://www.kzc.nl/explorer.png This screenshot
was taken with current CVS and Filips Wine dll snapshot at
http://www.volny.cz/xnavara/wine/dlls.zip

There are still many stability problems (lots of multi-threading
issues), unimplemented and buggy ReactOS features, but all in all we're
much better shape than I had expected to be at this point in time. If we
can keep up this pace 0.2 will be on time (before WineConf) and will
rock!

Gé van Geldorp.

[Steven Edwards]

--- Ge van Geldorp [e-mail] wrote:
> There are still many stability problems (lots of multi-threading
> issues), unimplemented and buggy ReactOS features, but all in all
> we're
> much better shape than I had expected to be at this point in time. If
> we
> can keep up this pace 0.2 will be on time (before WineConf) and will
> rock!

Very Very nice. Kickass work guys. I am hoping we can also get Mozilla
and OpenOffice at least loading before WineConf also.

Thanks
Steven

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

[Martin Fuchs]

Hello,

I'd like to show you a screenshot of the current status of shell32. I got it so far, that almost all icons are now extracted and displayed correctly.
Shell shortcuts are now working pretty good.   :-)

Could please someone confirm this on real ReactOS?
The screenshot is of ROS explorer running on XP with MSVC-compiled shell32.dll and comctl32.dll

Btw: Can anyone load explorer in ROS - I've got problems to run it
with the version in CVS since aproximately one week.

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Fuchs
[e-mail]

[Filip Navara]

Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Btw: Can anyone load explorer in ROS - I've got problems to run it
> with the version in CVS since aproximately one week.

Hi Martin,

I hope the problem you descibed me last week is fixed now. Have you 
tried the lastest CVS version?

Thanks
Filip

[Martin Fuchs]

Hello Filip,
> I hope the problem you descibed me last week is fixed now. Have you 
> tried the lastest CVS version?

No, even a "make clean all install" doesn't help.
I can only see a SIGSEV in the kernel debugger - no stack trace.

Regards,

Martin

[gge]

Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Hello Filip,
> > I hope the problem you descibed me last week is fixed now. Have you 
> > tried the lastest CVS version?
>
> No, even a "make clean all install" doesn't help.
> I can only see a SIGSEV in the kernel debugger - no stack trace.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin

Hello Martin,

*I got problem as well to install reactos since "make install"  replaced 
"install.bat" .*
I made a CVS update yesterday ans compiled reactos then to install 
reactos on hardisk , iI ran "make install"" as per new procedure
"make install" failed many times ( about 30) due to corruption of *D files :

- Sometimes I have to del *.d and then  to run  make + make install  was 
sufficient
- Sometimes I had todo make and then make install was ok
- Sometimes I had to run make + make clean and then make install

Therecatos  sub directories were in lib/.. ot hal or subsys or drivers.

Have you got this type of installation problem of reactos ?

Regards
Gerard

[Martin Fuchs]

> > No, even a "make clean all install" doesn't help.
> > I can only see a SIGSEV in the kernel debugger - no stack trace.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Martin
>
> Hello Martin,
> *I got problem as well to install reactos since "make install"  replaced 
> "install.bat" .*
> I made a CVS update yesterday ans compiled reactos then to install 
> reactos on hardisk , iI ran "make install"" as per new procedure
> "make install" failed many times ( about 30) due to corruption of *D files :
> Sometimes I have to del *.d and then  to run  make + make install  was
>
> sufficient
> Sometimes I had todo make and then make install was ok
> Sometimes I had to run make + make clean and then make install
> Therecatos  sub directories were in lib/.. ot hal or subsys or drivers.
> Have you got this type of installation problem of reactos ?

I deleted once more any *.d and *.o files, executed "make clean" and "make"

[Vizzini]

On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 11:48, Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to show you a screenshot of the current status of shell32. I got it so far, that almost all icons are now extracted and displayed correctly.
> Shell shortcuts are now working pretty good.   :-)
>
> Could please someone confirm this on real ReactOS?
> The screenshot is of ROS explorer running on XP with MSVC-compiled shell32.dll and comctl32.dll

Martin,

This looks fantastic!  I really can't wait to start shipping ROS with
this.  Great job.

-Vizzini

[Filip Navara]

Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Btw: Can anyone load explorer in ROS - I've got problems to run it
> with the version in CVS since aproximately one week.

Ok, and here is the screenshot under ReactOS:
    www.volny.cz/xnavara/reactos/explorer3.png
and updated prebuilt DLLs as always at
    www.volny.cz/xnavara/wine/

Regards,
Filip

[gge]

Martin Fuchs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to show you a screenshot of the current status of shell32. I got it so far, that almost all icons are now extracted and displayed correctly.
> Shell shortcuts are now working pretty good.   :-)
>
> Could please someone confirm this on real ReactOS?
> The screenshot is of ROS explorer running on XP with MSVC-compiled shell32.dll and comctl32.dll
>
> Btw: Can anyone load explorer in ROS - I've got problems to run it
> with the version in CVS since aproximately one week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin

Hello Martin,

Explorer runs in real hardware based on reactos+explorer  build dated 
23-12-03  and the last Dlld from Filip site.
The machine is not powerful ( Pentium I 233 )  and ros VGA driver is used.
After some testing , i will update about the reactos/explorer behavior 
in such condition .
But for sure it is much slower than Win98

Best regards
Gerard

[Martin Fuchs]

On 24.12.2003 00:41:51 gge wrote:
> Explorer runs in real hardware based on reactos+explorer  build dated 
> 23-12-03  and the last Dlld from Filip site.
> The machine is not powerful ( Pentium I 233 )  and ros VGA driver is used