On 17.02.2004 13:46:43 Robert Shearman wrote: Hi,
There is an interesting thread on the linux-kernel mailing list about the trying to add support for efficient case-insensitive lookups. Here's a link to the thread if anyone wants to read about it or possibly chip in :) http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0402.2/0273.html
They are now debatting about how to efficiently implement case insenitive filenames and how to handle problems with different character encodings in file/path names on the Linux kernel mailing list. Linus is at the position to implement this by introducing some work around-like new system calls. I think it isn't possible to do this correctly without handling any file names in the kernel using Unicode. (be it UTF-8, UTF-16 or the four byte encoding used in unix environments commonly)
NTFS has Unicode support since ages! I think this shows one main point, why NT has been called "New Technology".
So I am waiting for a main feature announcement for Linux version [23].[0-9].[0-9.]+ like "full Unicode support in kernel". :-)
Regards,
Martin
* Martin Fuchs martin-fuchs@gmx.net [2004-02-18 08:42:16 +0100]:
<snip>
NTFS has Unicode support since ages!
Well, I never ever had any thought of the need for unicode filenames.
cu
<snip> > NTFS has Unicode support since ages! Well, I never ever had any thought of the need for unicode filenames.
You not (and me also not) - but there are also japan and china people, who demant this - just as example.
You don't have to go that far, what about all the European languages that have accents. Accents are a mess without unicode.
Martin Fuchs wrote:
<snip>
NTFS has Unicode support since ages!
Well, I never ever had any thought of the need for unicode filenames.
You not (and me also not) - but there are also japan and china people, who demant this - just as example.