http://sourceforge.net/projects/dosbox/
I have seen that our dos VM is a bit on the weak side,
and since this is GPL, might be worth looking at. It's
allready written for win32.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
and i were just about to say
OMG,
i fell so young!
Tobias
>From: James Tabor <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net>
>Reply-To: ros-general(a)reactos.com
>To: ros-general(a)reactos.com
>Subject: Re: [ros-general] Wineconf Photo
>Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 02:07:33 +0000
>
>OMG,
>I feel so old!
>James
>
>Steven Edwards wrote:
>>http://www.lst.de/~mm/p2010033.jpg
>>
>>In case any of you want to see what viz really looks like =P.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Steven
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>ros-general mailing list
>ros-general(a)reactos.com
>http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
_________________________________________________________________
Få alle de nye og sjove ikoner med MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.dk
--- Dan Aloni <da-x(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Sat Rookie wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to use native linux drivers to access REAL hardware
> without
> > writing special wrappers for every device type?
> >
> > PS: I mean not 'Windows-Must-Have' hardware like keyboard or mouse
> but
> > ADDITIONAL hardware like MPEG Capture card, DVB TV Card,...
>
> Not currently. coLinux is designed to be a virtual Linux.
But do you think its possible via a Windows filer driver? I guess I am
thinking about replacing the Linux PnP implementation and passing it
off to the Windows PnP Manager and then using Linux network cards and
such as a quick and dirty wrapper to get Linux driver support for us on
ReactOS.
Thanks
Steven
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
Uh, guys?
Just as a potential user...
If I want a Linux Filesystem (which is INCOMPREHENSIBLE to me), I'll use Linux.
You are created an Open Sourced Windows Compatible OS.
Stick with compatibility as the first thing. THEN, if you can do something
faster and better without breaking compatibility.... Then do it!
But, If I wanted Linux, I'm well served by hundreds of Distributions...
There is currently, not ONE Windows Compatibile Open Sourced OS.
And thanks for making one!
Al
Hello,
to make visible as a picture what has been discussed in the recent discussion about drive letters, in which way to mount them and eventual extension for new file system standards, I want to post a screenshot of the new ROS Explorer version.
I implemented display of NT object namespace. So you can now see the internals of NTDLL, where and how drive letters are mounted and much more. Even the registry can been seen as an integrated part of NT object namespace.
--
Martin Fuchs
martin-fuchs(a)gmx.net
At 22:02 29/01/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>What the hell is this ? "Rene Tournois and RosAsm" ????
:)) It's me. :))
Well, if you'd like a 'diversion' time from your hard work, here is it:
This attack is from one of the guys of the Win32 Assembly "community".
I am the Author of RosAsm. RosAsm is an Assembly developement environement
written _for_ ReactOS (GPLed, of course). In its actual state, it is an
integrated package with Assembler, IDE, Sources Editor, Disassembler,
Sources Level Debugger, Resources Editor, and so on... 5+ years of patient
work... More than an "Assembler" it is, better said, a "PE Assembly
Producer", directely outputing Assembly written Applications, that i
started the day i first heard of the ReactOS Project...
As long as i can not yet Auto-Compile RosAsm under ReactOS, i make use
of Windows for the Developements, and of course, i have to face Pro-M$
/ Anti GPL guys. As you may guess, the relationships are quite 'hatefull'
and often times 'bloody'... ;)
This 'world affair' origine is in a Thread called "The State of the
Union", initiated by Beth, at alt.lang.asm News Group. I did not post
much in this thread, other than for shouting at a guy asking Beth to
shut up.
After this Donkey sent me several hatefull Mails and the discussion
went where it should go, in such cases (...). The sentences of mine
he is publishing where extracted from my Mails. Though i am not shy,
at all, of my political and ethical opinions, they were written in
a _private_ area, and, if i had to express them publicly, i would do
the same, but in a more 'civilized' manner.
Bye, keep up with the good and hard work. (Hurry up with the Menus
implementation, so that i can begin promoting RosAsm the positive
way... :)) as long as i will not begin promoting my Tool before i
could, at least, Auto-Compile it under ReactOS, and as long as i can
not do this, actually, without being told "writing GPL _for_ Windows.
Shame on me if ever!... ;)
Betov.
< http://betov.fre.fr/RosAsm.html >
lets replace rosapps/calc with this.
--- James Briggs <james(a)ActionMessage.com> wrote:
> From: "James Briggs" <james(a)ActionMessage.com>
> To: wine-patches(a)winehq.org
> Subject: Please review winecalc source
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:19:59 -0800
>
> Hello wineapps comrades.
>
> I have posted the source to my LGPL Windows calc clone here:
>
> http://am0.net/winecalc/
>
> Although it needs an updated parser (a day's work by me or somebody
> else),
> the program is otherwise in good shape. (I understand a dual stack
> approach for args and operators has worked for other calculator
> projects.)
>
> It builds on MSVC 7.0 and lcc.
>
> Please take a look at the source and notify me of what needs
> to be improved for wine apps checkin acceptance.
>
> Also, there are the standard language files a la winemine that
> need to be translated from English.
>
> I am interested in doing at least one more Wine desktop app in 2004,
> so
> your suggestions are welcome.
>
> Thanks, James Briggs.
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
It seems the release of 0.2 generated a lot of interest. Most of the
reactions are pretty predictable, either "Why???" or "Wow!!!" with the
"Wow" ones being in the majority I think.
The website served 1.8 million requests the last 24 hours. At times it
was overloaded, but it seems we have found a set of parameters which
works pretty well now.
Gé van Geldorp.